NHS consultants run private firms charging to cut waiting lists at their own hospitals

Guardian/Observer February 12th 2023

Calls for a ban as health trusts award ‘insourcing’ contracts worth millions to tackle backlogs

Clinical staff at work in a hospital
Clinical hospital staff at work. ‘Insourcing’ deals are increasing NHS reliance on the private sector to cut waiting lists. Photograph: Neil Hall/AFP/Getty Images

Some of the country’s most senior NHS clinicians are earning a lucrative sideline running private firms that offer to cut waiting lists at their own hospitals, the Observer can reveal.

Top consultants in Manchester, Sheffield and London are among directors of “insourcing” agencies that charge the health service to treat patients at weekends and evenings and have won millions of pounds of work.

Some hold leadership roles at NHS trusts that have awarded contracts to their own companies, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

One deputy medical director jointly ran a firm that provided “insourcing” solutions to his own NHS trust before it was sold in a £13m deal last year. Other consultants have set up firms that they and their colleagues work shifts through themselves, often at rates above NHS price caps.

The Centre for Health and the Public Interest, an independent thinktank, this weekend called for a ban on such arrangements. The General Medical Council said current conflict of interest policies did not always deliver “the transparency and assurance that patients rightly expect”.

An Observer investigation has found:

  • Three senior consultants in Sheffield ran a private firm, Pioneer Healthcare, offering insourcing services to help the NHS cut backlogs. The company won a series of contracts with local hospitals before being sold to a major private healthcare provider in a £13m deal;
  • At Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, three top surgeons including a clinical lead and a former clinical director are the owners of Fortify Clinic , a company offering “end to end” services to tackle waiting lists. The firm was paid £1.3m by the trust for work in 2022;
  • Two senior consultants at the Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust trust set up Venture Health Group in December and began contracting with their own trust that month to help it meet “challenging backlog targets”.

The deals are revealed as trusts ramp up reliance on the private sector to tackle record waiting lists, with the “insourcing” market alone projected to be worth £295m next year, up from £44m in 2019, according to analysts Mansfield Advisors.

“Insourcing” involves teams of doctors and nurses being drafted in to treat patients on NHS premises. Private companies offering insourcing solutions typically work outside normal hours and use spare theatre capacity. They may use their own anaesthetists and theatre staff but often rely on support staff and infrastructure from the host NHS trust.

Trusts say the services help clear backlogs and can be cheaper than outsourcing to private hospitals because the firms do not have the same fixed costs or overheads. But the growth of the sector has raised questions about value for money and potential conflicts of interest.

Pioneer Healthcare, which was sold last year to healthcare service firm Totally, is led by three senior consultants: Prof Prasad Godbole, deputy medical director at Sheffield Children’s NHS foundation trust; Hesham Zaki, lead paediatric neurosurgeon at the trust, and John McMullan, consultant neurosurgeon at Sheffield Children’s and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS foundation trust.

In addition to its other contracts, Pioneer has an initiative to cut waiting lists at Sheffield Children’s hospital, running 64 all-day theatre lists since 2021. It has also been paid more than £6.5m by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals from January 2019 to December 2022, including payments for a tendered £752,000 contract starting in May 2021 for “healthcare on trust premises”.

Another insourcing firm, Gastro Teams Seven 7 of Durham, has been paid more than £770,000 since January 2022 by County Durham and Darlington NHS Trust, where two of its directors work as consultants.

The trusts say all rules were followed and interests were publicly disclosed and managed appropriately, but the findings have led to calls for a review of conflict of interest rules for healthcare professionals

Alan Clamp, chief executive of the Professional Standards Authority, which oversees regulation of health professionals in the UK, called for a cross-sector review of managing conflicts in healthcare and urged regulators and employers to “tackle business practices” that “risk undermining public confidence”.

David Rowland, director of the Centre for Health and the Public Interest, said the current rules were “woefully weak” and called for a ban on arrangements of the sort identified by the Observer. He questioned whether potential conflicts could ever be effectively managed “if you’ve got money going from an NHS trust to a company owned by senior employees”.

“Even the perception of a potential conflict is damaging,” Rowland said.

A whistleblower at one trust where consultants run an insourcing firm said there had been “a lot of complaints” about the arrangements internally and called for greater scrutiny. “This is backdoor privatisation,” he said.

The growth of insourcing has also led to concerns about value for money for the NHS. Several firms have reported substantial profits and offer consultants £2,000 per 10-hour shift, higher than the £137.58 an hour maximum they could receive if paid in line with the NHS’s approved rates.

Prof Colin Melville, medical director at the General Medical Council, said patient trust could be damaged “if a doctor’s interests affect, or are seen to affect, their professional judgment”. “We know that current arrangements for managing conflicts of interest don’t always deliver the transparency and assurance that patients rightly expect,” he said.

Totally, which acquired Pioneer Healthcare in 2022, said the firm used otherwise spare hospital capacity to treat patients at costs “equal to or below” NHS tariffs and had helped cut NHS waiting lists by 40,000 a year. All contracts were awarded through “formal and anonymous procurement processes” to eliminate conflicts of interest and “directors of Pioneer who hold decision-making roles within trusts” were not involved.

Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust said all potential conflicts were “thoroughly considered and managed”. Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust said consultants who also worked for Pioneer were not involved in decision-making and there was no conflict of interest.

Fortify Clinic said it was on an NHS framework for insourcing and had complied with NHS rules. Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust said: “We undertake all non-pay procurement in accordance with public procurement contracts regulations, our governance framework and the Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply guidance.”

County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust said work undertaken by Gastro Teams Seven 7 had been “key to its pandemic recovery” and there was “no conflict of interest.”

Venture Health Group said it had followed processes around conflicts of interest. The Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust said the contract had been awarded directly to the firm during a “very challenging period” and that “a full procurement exercise to seek a longer term partner” would be undertaken in April.

The Department of Health and Social Care is considering a UK-wide system for doctors to declare their interests.

NHS England said: “While it’s in part thanks to the use of the independent sector that the NHS in England has already virtually eliminated two-year waits for elective treatment, guidance is clear that insourcing should not be used where temporary workers are paid escalated rates and suppliers must be registered with the [regulator] CQC.”

NHS becoming ‘cash cow’ for consultancy firms as contracts quadruple in value

Open Democracy February 10th 2023

Exclusive: NHS England allocated £83m for outsourced consultants last year – enough to train more than 1,600 new nurse

NHS England more than quadrupled its budget for outsourced consultancy work to £83m last year, new figures obtained by openDemocracy show.

The combined value of the health service’s consultancy contracts in 2022 could have trained more than 1,600 new nurses or paid for almost 14,000 hip operations.

Campaigners said the “ludicrous sums” are proof that the government has failed to learn from the billions the Department of Health and Social Care wasted on consultants for its ineffective NHS Test and Trace scheme during the pandemic.

Several of the consultancy firms that worked on the £37bn Covid testing programme were awarded NHS contracts last year, despite an inquiry finding the scheme failed to slow the pandemic and was “overly reliant on contractors”.

In total, NHS England awarded £83m worth of consultancy contracts last year – a fivefold increase on the £16m it awarded in 2021, according to data supplied by Tussell.

This included a contract worth up to £21m awarded to seven top consultancy firms in 2022 to help provide “short-term analytical and planning support” for tackling its post-Covid backlog.

The seven firms – which include Deloitte, Boston Consulting Group, KPMG, PriceWaterhouseCooper and McKinsey – could each be paid millions to help the 42 boards that manage NHS England services regionally to draft plans aimed at reducing waiting lists.

But campaigners have questioned whether the consultants can be trusted to put patient’s interests first.

“The more reliant NHS management becomes on management consultants, the less it focuses on patient care and public accountability, and the more emphasis it places on business methods, markets, profits and finding new roles for even more private contractors,” said John Lister, co-founder of the Save Our NHS campaign.

NHS England bosses have already told regional boards that their plans “need to include specific detail on how the system will maximise use of independent sector provider (ISP) capacity.”

In 2020, DHSC paid staff at two of the seven firms, Deloitte and Boston Consulting Group, as much as £6,600 a day to work on Test and Trace. The overall value of consultancy and auditing contracts handed to Deloitte by the NHS in 2022 increased from £590,000 in 2021 to £10m.

The data provided by Tussell shows how much NHS England – the national organisation responsible for running the NHS in England – budgeted to spend on each consultancy contract it awarded, but the actual spend could be lower or higher. The total consultancy budget for every NHS body in England will be higher, as local NHS trusts can also contract consultants but are not included in the data.

‘Ludicrous sums of money’

PA Consulting Group topped the list of NHS consultants in 2022, receiving a total of £22m worth of contracts, including £10m to support the Covid vaccination programme.

Consultancy firms appear to have increased their overall involvement in the vaccination programme, receiving NHS England contracts worth £23m in 2022 – compared to £14m in 2021.

“This government’s eagerness to funnel public money into private companies in a variety of ways, while they starve public services of funding, is deeply concerning. It is also illogical. One report published in 2018 showed that employing consultants within NHS Trusts in England made things less efficient, not more,” said Dr Julia Patterson, chief executive of campaign group EveryDoctor.

“If the government wants to improve the service, they will start listening to healthcare leaders, clinicians and patients at a national and local level to create meaningful solutions, instead of paying management consultants these ludicrous sums of money.”

Dr John Puntis, a retired paediatrician and co-chair of Keep Our NHS Public said: “People often think of NHS privatisation in terms of selling off patient care services. In fact, the main area of action at present is backroom office support, embedding private companies within the NHS and extending their influence over the service as a whole.

“The government is highly susceptible to lobbying by private firms as was highlighted during the Covid pandemic with the test and trace and PPE fiascos. These generous contracts to consultancies provide further confirmation of this. Increasingly, the NHS is seen as a cash cow for private companies.”

On Tuesday, the Guardian revealed that the government have quietly dropped restrictions on consultancy spending, allowing Whitehall departments to potentially spend millions more on big consultancy firms.

The changes come despite past warnings from ministers that consultants waste taxpayer money and “infantilise” civil servants.

While NHS England increased the total value of contracts it awarded to consultants in 2022, the total value of Department of Health and Social Care consultancy contracts dropped. In 2021, the department awarded £456,650,548 in largely Covid-related contracts to consultants, while last year it awarded £42,190,706.

An NHS England spokesperson said: “The NHS continues to deal with the effects of a once-in-a-generation pandemic, and while the actual spend is likely to be lower than the maximum amounts described, it is right that local teams are able to access additional expert support in their efforts to restore and improve services for patients.

“The NHS is one of the most efficient health services in the world, and while our life-saving Covid-19 vaccination service was found by the Public Accounts Committee to be a great use of taxpayer money, expenditure on this – as well as in other areas – is set to dramatically reduce in the next financial year.”

‘POLICY AND REGULATION BRANDING AGENCY HIRED TO HELP ‘CULTIVATE NEW PERSONALITY’ FOR NHSE’

Health Service Journal February 7th 2023

NHS England will attempt to ‘cultivate the right personality’ as an
‘empowering coach-like leader’ in part to ‘rebuild lost trust’ with the
service.

The strategy has emerged from work undertaken by branding agency Thompson.
It has been engaged by NHSE to help “position” the “future role” of the
organisation after its merger with NHS Digital and Health Education
England.

The “interim update for senior leaders” presented by Thompson and senior
NHSE comms managers last month, and seen by HSJ, seeks to put forward a
“central narrative” and “messaging framework”, for the “new NHS England”.

Thompson carried out research among senior NHSE figures, including
director of transformation Tim Ferris, Health Education England chief
executive Navina Evans and deputy chief operating officer Mark Cubbon
during the last three months of 2022. It also studied a range of NHSE
strategy documents and interviews given to HSJ by NHSE director of
strategy Chris Hopson and departing NHSD CEO Simon Bolton.

The research concluded that “many stakeholders” felt it was “important to
rebuild what they see as lost trust [in NHSE]”.

The leaders surveyed said they wanted “the new NHS England” to be
“positioned primarily as a facilitator of improvement”, and for the
organisation to be seen as “part of the solution, rather than part of the
problem”.

Stakeholders felt this could be achieved by a “shift in tone” from an
“authoritative” approach to a “collaborative one”. They recommended NHS
become “a servant leader”, able to effectively communicate what “system
working means”.

They also wanted to “allay the fear” that HEE and NHSD’s “functions are
being related to positions of lower authority”.

In response to the research, Thompson made a number of recommendations.
These included that NHSE:

  “Reframe” its “core function” away from “regulation, policy and budget
control” to focus on “collaboration and system working”.
  “Cultivate the right personality” of an “empowering coach-like leader”.
  “Adopt a ‘down to earth’ type of voice… to avoid the perception that
NHS England is an ‘ivory tower’.” The new NHSE should be “able to
communicate on the same level as its audience”.
  Build “credibility” and avoid being seen as “disconnected from
frontline realities” by developing “messages that demonstrate empathy
with “concerns on the ground”.
  “Actively combat the media-driven narrative of NHS England being made
up solely of bureaucrats”.

The information seen by HSJ said these recommendations would “become the
core requirements” of a campaign to be launched in April.

NHSE chief executive Amanda Pritchard has stressed on a number of
occasions her wish to establish a more collegiate relationship with the
service. She has, for example, brought a range of senior trust chief
executives into part-time roles within the organisation. The ongoing
Hewitt review is expected to recommend that NHSE give more autonomy to
integrated care systems, and the latest planning guidance to the service
featured far fewer detailed requirements than in previous years.

An NHSE spokesperson said: “We have always been clear, as set out in our
operating framework, NHSE is changing the way that it works to reflect the
move to system-based approaches and stronger partnership working. As we
bring together three large organisations and with any merger of this
scale, complex and detailed work is needed to establish how the new
organisation will operate – this piece of work was undertaken to support
that.”

The branding and digital design agency Thompson has worked closely with
NHSE in the past. For example, in 2016 it helped “develop a comprehensive
identity policy” for the service.